|
To receive tips, news and alerts by email. |
| NRDC Scientist Sarah Janssen | ||||||||||
| sep 18 |
FDA on BPA: The public is not reassuredYesterday, I attended FDA's public meeting on BPA and gave public comments.
One thing that struck me was there were 20 public commentators - 2 were from industry, 2 were from animal rights groups (they were relatively neutral on the food uses, they just don't want any more animal tests), and the rest of the commentators were from public interest, environmental, health-affected groups (that's about 16 health groups--all speaking out against BPA's health effects). Even the lead investigator on a new BPA study put out by JAMA (highlighted yesterday in a US News and World Report article) was there to discuss his ground breaking work. One of the big problems is that the FDA subcommittee has not had time to evaluate the new science on BPA, even though it should be given ample time to make a decision that affects the health of millions of Americans. FDA shouldn't be pressured and rushed when the health of our children is at stake. Read Sarah's related post, FDA on BPA: Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Eat No Evil?
New Comment |
Posts from Switchboard, NRDC's Blog
- Environmental Regulations? What Environmental Regulations? posted by NRDC News
- EPA denies NRDC petition to cancel bee-toxic pesticide carbaryl posted by Jennifer Sass
- FDA continues to ignore BPA science, has another shot Friday posted by Sarah Janssen
- Breast Cancer Awareness: From Pink Ribbons to a Right to Know Law posted by Frances Beinecke
- NRDC to FDA: Ban BPA from our Food posted by Sarah Janssen


