| NRDC Scientist Sarah Janssen | ||||||||||
sep 18 |
FDA on BPA: The public is not reassuredYesterday, I attended FDA's public meeting on BPA and gave public comments.
One thing that struck me was there were 20 public commentators - 2 were from industry, 2 were from animal rights groups (they were relatively neutral on the food uses, they just don't want any more animal tests), and the rest of the commentators were from public interest, environmental, health-affected groups (that's about 16 health groups--all speaking out against BPA's health effects). Even the lead investigator on a new BPA study put out by JAMA (highlighted yesterday in a US News and World Report article) was there to discuss his ground breaking work. One of the big problems is that the FDA subcommittee has not had time to evaluate the new science on BPA, even though it should be given ample time to make a decision that affects the health of millions of Americans. FDA shouldn't be pressured and rushed when the health of our children is at stake. Read Sarah's related post, FDA on BPA: Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Eat No Evil?
New Comment
|
Read More
- Rubber Ducky You're Not The One
- Toxic Flea and Tick Treatments
- Pesticides on Playing Fields
- Arsenic in Playground Equipment
- Toxic Pet Products May Harm Children and Pets
- Calling in the Experts to Battle Roaches
- Battling Roaches Without Pesticides
- Not Safe for Baby?
- Playing With Dangerous Pesticides
- Got Milk? How About Local Organic Milk?
- Is it worth it to buy an organic crib mattress for our baby?
- How much mercury is in your sushi?
- Pesticides on Produce
- Lurking Lead in the Home
- Dangers of the Sippy Cup?
- Welcome to Baby Steps!


Send this post to a friend